Coverage Register

Kidnap and ransom

Ransom, response consultants, loss of earnings and legal liability arising from the kidnap, detention or extortion of staff, usually while travelling or posted to higher-risk countries.

On the schedule

Also calledK&R, kidnap, ransom and extortion, special risks
FamilyPeople
Responds whenA staff member is detained or kidnapped, or the business is extorted.

Which industries carry it

Usually held bynone of the twenty classes as a usual line; bought for a specific exposure
Often needed, often lackingnot on any watch list

Standards this line engages

5 clauses

Clause text quoted from a human-verified compliance corpus under licence. Clauses marked for APRA-regulated buyers or US insurance licensees appear on a register only for those buyers.

ISO 31000 6.5.2 Selection of risk treatment options

Guidance: choosing treatment options balances the benefits for the objectives against the cost, effort and disadvantages of implementing them. Options are not mutually exclusive and not all fit every situation; they include avoiding the risk by not starting or continuing the activity, taking or increasing the risk to pursue an opportunity, removing the risk ...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Treatment option analysis per risk showing the options considered, their cost and benefit, and the one chosen; Insurance schedule, contracts and other risk-sharing arrangements tied to the risks they transfer; Documented retained and residual risk with the decision maker's acceptance
Common gap: Only mitigation considered; avoiding, taking or sharing never on the table
ISO 31000:2018 on compliance.theartofservice.com
ISO 31000 6.4.2 Risk identification

Guidance: risk identification finds, recognizes and describes the risks that might help or prevent the organization achieving its objectives, and depends on relevant, appropriate and current information. A range of techniques can be used to find the uncertainties that affect objectives, and the following factors and the relationships between them should be c...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Risk register entries with source, event, cause and consequence described; Identification techniques used (workshops, checklists, scenario analysis, indicators) and who took part; Opportunities recorded alongside threats
Common gap: Only threats identified, never opportunities
ISO 31000:2018 on compliance.theartofservice.com
COSO ERM principle 5 Attracts, Develops, and Retains Capable Individuals

The organization is committed to building human capital aligned to strategy and business objectives.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Talent strategy document; Succession plans; Competency frameworks
Common gap: No risk-specific competencies
COSO ERM 2017 on compliance.theartofservice.com
ISO 31000 5.4.3 Assigning organizational roles, authorities, responsibilities and accountabilities

Guidance: top management and oversight bodies should ensure that the authorities, responsibilities and accountabilities for every relevant risk management role are assigned and communicated at all levels of the organization. In doing so they should make clear that managing risk is a core responsibility rather than an add-on, and should identify the individua...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Named risk owners for each significant risk; RACI or equivalent assignment of risk management roles and authorities; Role descriptions and delegations that carry risk accountability
Common gap: Risks recorded without an owner, or owned by a committee
ISO 31000:2018 on compliance.theartofservice.com
ISO 22301 8.4.2 Response structure

Implement and maintain a structure of one or more teams responsible for responding to disruptions, with roles, responsibilities and inter team relationships clearly stated, collectively competent to assess a disruption and its impact against pre defined thresholds justifying a formal response, activate the response and the continuity solutions, plan actions,...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Team structure chart with roles, responsibilities and inter team relationships; Pre defined activation thresholds and the authority to invoke them; Named team members and alternates with competence evidence
Common gap: Alternates named on paper but never included in an exercise
ISO 22301:2019 on compliance.theartofservice.com

Do this for every line on your schedule

Paste the schedule and get this classification for every line at once, with the retained and transferred figures, the rate on line, the loss ratio, the findings and the questions for the broker. Six lines free, no account.

Build my coverage register

Key person · Personal accident